Bacon vs Beef Sirloin

Side-by-side macro comparison. Bacon vs Beef Sirloin per their standard serving sizes.

Bacon

per 2 strips cooked (16g)

86 cal
6g Protein
0g Carbs
7g Fat
Full Bacon macros →
vs

Beef Sirloin

per 100g cooked

206 cal
27g Protein
0g Carbs
10g Fat
Full Beef Sirloin macros →

Macro Comparison Table

Macro Bacon Beef Sirloin Difference
Calories 86 cal 206 cal -58% Bacon
Protein 6g 27g -78% Bacon
Carbs 0g 0g 0% Bacon
Fat 7g 10g -30% Bacon

Differences shown relative to Bacon. Positive = Bacon has more.

Which Is Better for Your Goal?

🔥 Weight Loss

Beef Sirloin

Higher protein-to-calorie density + lower absolute fat = more satiety per calorie.

💪 Muscle Gain

Beef Sirloin

Higher absolute protein per serving better supports muscle protein synthesis.

🥑 Low-Carb / Keto

tie

Lower carbohydrate content fits keto and low-carb macros without burning your carb budget.

Both fit most balanced diets. These verdicts reflect macro-only comparisons — taste, satiety, cost, and personal preference also matter.

Find Your Personal Macros

The "right" food depends on your individual macro targets. Calculate yours in 60 seconds:

→ Calculate My Macros (Free)

Related Comparisons

Other ways Bacon and Beef Sirloin stack up:

Full Bacon guideFull Beef Sirloin guideAll comparisons