Blue Cheese vs Canned Tuna (in water)

Side-by-side macro comparison. Blue Cheese vs Canned Tuna (in water) per their standard serving sizes.

Blue Cheese

per 1 oz (28g)

100 cal
6g Protein
0.7g Carbs
8g Fat
Full Blue Cheese macros →
vs

Canned Tuna (in water)

per 1 can (142g drained)

130 cal
27g Protein
0g Carbs
1g Fat
Full Canned Tuna (in water) macros →

Macro Comparison Table

Macro Blue Cheese Canned Tuna (in water) Difference
Calories 100 cal 130 cal -23% Blue
Protein 6g 27g -78% Blue
Carbs 0.7g 0g 0% Blue
Fat 8g 1g +700% Blue

Differences shown relative to Blue Cheese. Positive = Blue Cheese has more.

Quick Take

Blue Cheese delivers 100 calories per serving with 6g protein, 0.7g carbs, and 8g fat. Canned Tuna (in water) delivers 130 calories with 27g protein, 0g carbs, and 1g fat. The most meaningful difference: they're within 30 calories per serving, so calorie load is essentially equivalent. For protein density per calorie, Canned Tuna (in water) wins at 83% of calories from protein.

When to Pick Each

For Cutting / Weight Loss

When cutting on a tight calorie budget, Blue Cheese gives you 30 more calories of headroom per serving — that's room for an extra snack, more vegetables, or a higher-protein second portion. If protein density matters more (which it does for preserving muscle on a deficit), Canned Tuna (in water) delivers more grams of protein per calorie consumed.

For Bulking / Muscle Gain

For muscle gain, you want calories AND protein. Canned Tuna (in water) brings 130 calories — useful when you're chasing a surplus and struggling to eat enough. Canned Tuna (in water) delivers 27g of protein per serving, which directly feeds muscle protein synthesis. The best pick depends on whether you need more total calories or more usable protein.

For Keto / Low-Carb

Both Blue Cheese and Canned Tuna (in water) are keto-friendly with under 10g carbs per serving.

Frequently Asked

Which has more protein, Blue Cheese or Canned Tuna (in water)?

Canned Tuna (in water) has more protein: 27g vs 6g per serving. That's a difference of 21g.

Which has fewer calories, Blue Cheese or Canned Tuna (in water)?

Blue Cheese has 100 calories per serving vs 130 calories in Canned Tuna (in water) — a difference of 30 calories.

Is Blue Cheese or Canned Tuna (in water) better for keto?

Canned Tuna (in water) is the better keto choice at 0g carbs per serving vs 0.7g carbs in Blue Cheese.

Is Blue Cheese or Canned Tuna (in water) better for weight loss?

For weight loss, Blue Cheese gives you more calorie flexibility (30 cal less per serving). For preserving muscle during a deficit, Canned Tuna (in water) delivers more protein per calorie. Most people on cuts benefit from Canned Tuna (in water).

Which Is Better for Your Goal?

🔥 Weight Loss

Canned Tuna (in water)

Higher protein-to-calorie density + lower absolute fat = more satiety per calorie.

💪 Muscle Gain

Canned Tuna (in water)

Higher absolute protein per serving better supports muscle protein synthesis.

🥑 Low-Carb / Keto

Canned Tuna (in water)

Lower carbohydrate content fits keto and low-carb macros without burning your carb budget.

Both fit most balanced diets. These verdicts reflect macro-only comparisons — taste, satiety, cost, and personal preference also matter.

Find Your Personal Macros

The "right" food depends on your individual macro targets. Calculate yours in 60 seconds:

→ Calculate My Macros (Free)

Related Comparisons

Other ways Blue Cheese and Canned Tuna (in water) stack up:

Full Blue Cheese guideFull Canned Tuna (in water) guideAll comparisons