Canned Chicken vs Tuna
Side-by-side macro comparison. Canned Chicken vs Tuna per their standard serving sizes.
Canned Chicken
per 2 oz drained (56g)
Macro Comparison Table
| Macro | Canned Chicken | Tuna | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 60 cal | 116 cal | -48% Canned |
| Protein | 14g | 26g | -46% Canned |
| Carbs | 0g | 0g | 0% Canned |
| Fat | 1g | 0.8g | +25% Canned |
Differences shown relative to Canned Chicken. Positive = Canned Chicken has more.
Quick Take
Canned Chicken delivers 60 calories per serving with 14g protein, 0g carbs, and 1g fat. Tuna delivers 116 calories with 26g protein, 0g carbs, and 0.8g fat. The most meaningful difference: Canned Chicken saves 56 calories per serving — meaningful over a week of meals. For protein density per calorie, Canned Chicken wins at 93% of calories from protein.
When to Pick Each
For Cutting / Weight Loss
When cutting on a tight calorie budget, Canned Chicken gives you 56 more calories of headroom per serving — that's room for an extra snack, more vegetables, or a higher-protein second portion. If protein density matters more (which it does for preserving muscle on a deficit), Canned Chicken delivers more grams of protein per calorie consumed.
For Bulking / Muscle Gain
For muscle gain, you want calories AND protein. Tuna brings 116 calories — useful when you're chasing a surplus and struggling to eat enough. Tuna delivers 26g of protein per serving, which directly feeds muscle protein synthesis. The best pick depends on whether you need more total calories or more usable protein.
For Keto / Low-Carb
Both Canned Chicken and Tuna are keto-friendly with under 10g carbs per serving.
Frequently Asked
Which has more protein, Canned Chicken or Tuna?
Tuna has more protein: 26g vs 14g per serving. That's a difference of 12g.
Which has fewer calories, Canned Chicken or Tuna?
Canned Chicken has 60 calories per serving vs 116 calories in Tuna — a difference of 56 calories.
Is Canned Chicken or Tuna better for keto?
Tuna is the better keto choice at 0g carbs per serving vs 0g carbs in Canned Chicken.
Is Canned Chicken or Tuna better for weight loss?
For weight loss, Canned Chicken gives you more calorie flexibility (56 cal less per serving). For preserving muscle during a deficit, Canned Chicken delivers more protein per calorie. Most people on cuts benefit from Canned Chicken.
Which Is Better for Your Goal?
🔥 Weight Loss
Canned Chicken
Higher protein-to-calorie density + lower absolute fat = more satiety per calorie.
💪 Muscle Gain
Tuna
Higher absolute protein per serving better supports muscle protein synthesis.
🥑 Low-Carb / Keto
tie
Lower carbohydrate content fits keto and low-carb macros without burning your carb budget.
Both fit most balanced diets. These verdicts reflect macro-only comparisons — taste, satiety, cost, and personal preference also matter.
Find Your Personal Macros
The "right" food depends on your individual macro targets. Calculate yours in 60 seconds:
→ Calculate My Macros (Free)Related Comparisons
Other ways Canned Chicken and Tuna stack up:
Full Canned Chicken guide • Full Tuna guide • All comparisons