Canned Tuna (in water) vs Impossible Burger
Side-by-side macro comparison. Canned Tuna (in water) vs Impossible Burger per their standard serving sizes.
Canned Tuna (in water)
per 1 can (142g drained)
Impossible Burger
per 4oz patty, 113g
Macro Comparison Table
| Macro | Canned Tuna (in water) | Impossible Burger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 130 cal | 240 cal | -46% Canned |
| Protein | 27g | 19g | +42% Canned |
| Carbs | 0g | 9g | -100% Canned |
| Fat | 1g | 14g | -93% Canned |
Differences shown relative to Canned Tuna (in water). Positive = Canned Tuna (in water) has more.
Quick Take
Canned Tuna (in water) delivers 130 calories per serving with 27g protein, 0g carbs, and 1g fat. Impossible Burger delivers 240 calories with 19g protein, 9g carbs, and 14g fat. The most meaningful difference: Canned Tuna (in water) saves 110 calories per serving — meaningful over a week of meals. For protein density per calorie, Canned Tuna (in water) wins at 83% of calories from protein.
When to Pick Each
For Cutting / Weight Loss
When cutting on a tight calorie budget, Canned Tuna (in water) gives you 110 more calories of headroom per serving — that's room for an extra snack, more vegetables, or a higher-protein second portion. If protein density matters more (which it does for preserving muscle on a deficit), Canned Tuna (in water) delivers more grams of protein per calorie consumed.
For Bulking / Muscle Gain
For muscle gain, you want calories AND protein. Impossible Burger brings 240 calories — useful when you're chasing a surplus and struggling to eat enough. Canned Tuna (in water) delivers 27g of protein per serving, which directly feeds muscle protein synthesis. The best pick depends on whether you need more total calories or more usable protein.
For Keto / Low-Carb
Both Canned Tuna (in water) and Impossible Burger are keto-friendly with under 10g carbs per serving.
Frequently Asked
Which has more protein, Canned Tuna (in water) or Impossible Burger?
Canned Tuna (in water) has more protein: 27g vs 19g per serving. That's a difference of 8g.
Which has fewer calories, Canned Tuna (in water) or Impossible Burger?
Canned Tuna (in water) has 130 calories per serving vs 240 calories in Impossible Burger — a difference of 110 calories.
Is Canned Tuna (in water) or Impossible Burger better for keto?
Canned Tuna (in water) is the better keto choice at 0g carbs per serving vs 9g carbs in Impossible Burger.
Is Canned Tuna (in water) or Impossible Burger better for weight loss?
For weight loss, Canned Tuna (in water) gives you more calorie flexibility (110 cal less per serving). For preserving muscle during a deficit, Canned Tuna (in water) delivers more protein per calorie. Most people on cuts benefit from Canned Tuna (in water).
Which Is Better for Your Goal?
🔥 Weight Loss
Canned Tuna (in water)
Higher protein-to-calorie density + lower absolute fat = more satiety per calorie.
💪 Muscle Gain
Canned Tuna (in water)
Higher absolute protein per serving better supports muscle protein synthesis.
🥑 Low-Carb / Keto
Canned Tuna (in water)
Lower carbohydrate content fits keto and low-carb macros without burning your carb budget.
Both fit most balanced diets. These verdicts reflect macro-only comparisons — taste, satiety, cost, and personal preference also matter.
Find Your Personal Macros
The "right" food depends on your individual macro targets. Calculate yours in 60 seconds:
→ Calculate My Macros (Free)Related Comparisons
Other ways Canned Tuna (in water) and Impossible Burger stack up:
Full Canned Tuna (in water) guide • Full Impossible Burger guide • All comparisons