Canned Tuna (in water) vs Swiss Cheese

Side-by-side macro comparison. Canned Tuna (in water) vs Swiss Cheese per their standard serving sizes.

Canned Tuna (in water)

per 1 can (142g drained)

130 cal
27g Protein
0g Carbs
1g Fat
Full Canned Tuna (in water) macros →
vs

Swiss Cheese

per 1 oz (28g)

108 cal
8g Protein
1.5g Carbs
8g Fat
Full Swiss Cheese macros →

Macro Comparison Table

Macro Canned Tuna (in water) Swiss Cheese Difference
Calories 130 cal 108 cal +20% Canned
Protein 27g 8g +238% Canned
Carbs 0g 1.5g -100% Canned
Fat 1g 8g -87% Canned

Differences shown relative to Canned Tuna (in water). Positive = Canned Tuna (in water) has more.

Quick Take

Canned Tuna (in water) delivers 130 calories per serving with 27g protein, 0g carbs, and 1g fat. Swiss Cheese delivers 108 calories with 8g protein, 1.5g carbs, and 8g fat. The most meaningful difference: they're within 22 calories per serving, so calorie load is essentially equivalent. For protein density per calorie, Canned Tuna (in water) wins at 83% of calories from protein.

When to Pick Each

For Cutting / Weight Loss

When cutting on a tight calorie budget, Swiss Cheese gives you 22 more calories of headroom per serving — that's room for an extra snack, more vegetables, or a higher-protein second portion. If protein density matters more (which it does for preserving muscle on a deficit), Canned Tuna (in water) delivers more grams of protein per calorie consumed.

For Bulking / Muscle Gain

For muscle gain, you want calories AND protein. Canned Tuna (in water) brings 130 calories — useful when you're chasing a surplus and struggling to eat enough. Canned Tuna (in water) delivers 27g of protein per serving, which directly feeds muscle protein synthesis. The best pick depends on whether you need more total calories or more usable protein.

For Keto / Low-Carb

Both Canned Tuna (in water) and Swiss Cheese are keto-friendly with under 10g carbs per serving.

Frequently Asked

Which has more protein, Canned Tuna (in water) or Swiss Cheese?

Canned Tuna (in water) has more protein: 27g vs 8g per serving. That's a difference of 19g.

Which has fewer calories, Canned Tuna (in water) or Swiss Cheese?

Swiss Cheese has 108 calories per serving vs 130 calories in Canned Tuna (in water) — a difference of 22 calories.

Is Canned Tuna (in water) or Swiss Cheese better for keto?

Canned Tuna (in water) is the better keto choice at 0g carbs per serving vs 1.5g carbs in Swiss Cheese.

Is Canned Tuna (in water) or Swiss Cheese better for weight loss?

For weight loss, Swiss Cheese gives you more calorie flexibility (22 cal less per serving). For preserving muscle during a deficit, Canned Tuna (in water) delivers more protein per calorie. Most people on cuts benefit from Canned Tuna (in water).

Which Is Better for Your Goal?

🔥 Weight Loss

Canned Tuna (in water)

Higher protein-to-calorie density + lower absolute fat = more satiety per calorie.

💪 Muscle Gain

Canned Tuna (in water)

Higher absolute protein per serving better supports muscle protein synthesis.

🥑 Low-Carb / Keto

Canned Tuna (in water)

Lower carbohydrate content fits keto and low-carb macros without burning your carb budget.

Both fit most balanced diets. These verdicts reflect macro-only comparisons — taste, satiety, cost, and personal preference also matter.

Find Your Personal Macros

The "right" food depends on your individual macro targets. Calculate yours in 60 seconds:

→ Calculate My Macros (Free)

Related Comparisons

Other ways Canned Tuna (in water) and Swiss Cheese stack up:

Full Canned Tuna (in water) guideFull Swiss Cheese guideAll comparisons