Canned Tuna (in water) vs Turkey

Side-by-side macro comparison. Canned Tuna (in water) vs Turkey per their standard serving sizes.

Canned Tuna (in water)

per 1 can (142g drained)

130 cal
27g Protein
0g Carbs
1g Fat
Full Canned Tuna (in water) macros →
vs

Turkey

per 100g cooked

135 cal
30g Protein
0g Carbs
1g Fat
Full Turkey macros →

Macro Comparison Table

Macro Canned Tuna (in water) Turkey Difference
Calories 130 cal 135 cal -4% Canned
Protein 27g 30g -10% Canned
Carbs 0g 0g 0% Canned
Fat 1g 1g 0% Canned

Differences shown relative to Canned Tuna (in water). Positive = Canned Tuna (in water) has more.

Quick Take

Canned Tuna (in water) delivers 130 calories per serving with 27g protein, 0g carbs, and 1g fat. Turkey delivers 135 calories with 30g protein, 0g carbs, and 1g fat. The most meaningful difference: they're within 5 calories per serving, so calorie load is essentially equivalent. Both deliver similar protein density.

When to Pick Each

For Cutting / Weight Loss

When cutting on a tight calorie budget, Canned Tuna (in water) gives you 5 more calories of headroom per serving — that's room for an extra snack, more vegetables, or a higher-protein second portion. If protein density matters more (which it does for preserving muscle on a deficit), Turkey delivers more grams of protein per calorie consumed.

For Bulking / Muscle Gain

For muscle gain, you want calories AND protein. Turkey brings 135 calories — useful when you're chasing a surplus and struggling to eat enough. Turkey delivers 30g of protein per serving, which directly feeds muscle protein synthesis. The best pick depends on whether you need more total calories or more usable protein.

For Keto / Low-Carb

Both Canned Tuna (in water) and Turkey are keto-friendly with under 10g carbs per serving.

Frequently Asked

Which has more protein, Canned Tuna (in water) or Turkey?

Turkey has more protein: 30g vs 27g per serving. That's a difference of 3g.

Which has fewer calories, Canned Tuna (in water) or Turkey?

Canned Tuna (in water) has 130 calories per serving vs 135 calories in Turkey — a difference of 5 calories.

Is Canned Tuna (in water) or Turkey better for keto?

Turkey is the better keto choice at 0g carbs per serving vs 0g carbs in Canned Tuna (in water).

Is Canned Tuna (in water) or Turkey better for weight loss?

For weight loss, Canned Tuna (in water) gives you more calorie flexibility (5 cal less per serving). For preserving muscle during a deficit, Turkey delivers more protein per calorie. Most people on cuts benefit from Turkey.

Which Is Better for Your Goal?

🔥 Weight Loss

Turkey

Higher protein-to-calorie density + lower absolute fat = more satiety per calorie.

💪 Muscle Gain

Turkey

Higher absolute protein per serving better supports muscle protein synthesis.

🥑 Low-Carb / Keto

tie

Lower carbohydrate content fits keto and low-carb macros without burning your carb budget.

Both fit most balanced diets. These verdicts reflect macro-only comparisons — taste, satiety, cost, and personal preference also matter.

Find Your Personal Macros

The "right" food depends on your individual macro targets. Calculate yours in 60 seconds:

→ Calculate My Macros (Free)

Related Comparisons

Other ways Canned Tuna (in water) and Turkey stack up:

Full Canned Tuna (in water) guideFull Turkey guideAll comparisons