Beef Sirloin vs Salmon

Side-by-side macro comparison. Beef Sirloin vs Salmon per their standard serving sizes.

Beef Sirloin

per 100g cooked

206 cal
27g Protein
0g Carbs
10g Fat
Full Beef Sirloin macros →
vs

Salmon

per 100g cooked

208 cal
20g Protein
0g Carbs
13g Fat
Full Salmon macros →

Macro Comparison Table

Macro Beef Sirloin Salmon Difference
Calories 206 cal 208 cal -1% Beef
Protein 27g 20g +35% Beef
Carbs 0g 0g 0% Beef
Fat 10g 13g -23% Beef

Differences shown relative to Beef Sirloin. Positive = Beef Sirloin has more.

Which Is Better for Your Goal?

🔥 Weight Loss

Beef Sirloin

Higher protein-to-calorie density + lower absolute fat = more satiety per calorie.

💪 Muscle Gain

Beef Sirloin

Higher absolute protein per serving better supports muscle protein synthesis.

🥑 Low-Carb / Keto

tie

Lower carbohydrate content fits keto and low-carb macros without burning your carb budget.

Both fit most balanced diets. These verdicts reflect macro-only comparisons — taste, satiety, cost, and personal preference also matter.

Find Your Personal Macros

The "right" food depends on your individual macro targets. Calculate yours in 60 seconds:

→ Calculate My Macros (Free)

Related Comparisons

Other ways Beef Sirloin and Salmon stack up:

Full Beef Sirloin guideFull Salmon guideAll comparisons