Canned Tuna (in water) vs Edamame

Side-by-side macro comparison. Canned Tuna (in water) vs Edamame per their standard serving sizes.

Canned Tuna (in water)

per 1 can (142g drained)

130 cal
27g Protein
0g Carbs
1g Fat
Full Canned Tuna (in water) macros →
vs

Edamame

per 1 cup shelled (155g)

188 cal
18g Protein
14g Carbs
8g Fat
Full Edamame macros →

Macro Comparison Table

Macro Canned Tuna (in water) Edamame Difference
Calories 130 cal 188 cal -31% Canned
Protein 27g 18g +50% Canned
Carbs 0g 14g -100% Canned
Fat 1g 8g -87% Canned

Differences shown relative to Canned Tuna (in water). Positive = Canned Tuna (in water) has more.

Quick Take

Canned Tuna (in water) delivers 130 calories per serving with 27g protein, 0g carbs, and 1g fat. Edamame delivers 188 calories with 18g protein, 14g carbs, and 8g fat. The most meaningful difference: Canned Tuna (in water) saves 58 calories per serving — meaningful over a week of meals. For protein density per calorie, Canned Tuna (in water) wins at 83% of calories from protein.

When to Pick Each

For Cutting / Weight Loss

When cutting on a tight calorie budget, Canned Tuna (in water) gives you 58 more calories of headroom per serving — that's room for an extra snack, more vegetables, or a higher-protein second portion. If protein density matters more (which it does for preserving muscle on a deficit), Canned Tuna (in water) delivers more grams of protein per calorie consumed.

For Bulking / Muscle Gain

For muscle gain, you want calories AND protein. Edamame brings 188 calories — useful when you're chasing a surplus and struggling to eat enough. Canned Tuna (in water) delivers 27g of protein per serving, which directly feeds muscle protein synthesis. The best pick depends on whether you need more total calories or more usable protein.

For Keto / Low-Carb

Canned Tuna (in water) fits cleanly into keto with only 0g carbs. Edamame at 14g carbs uses significantly more of your daily 20g carb budget.

Frequently Asked

Which has more protein, Canned Tuna (in water) or Edamame?

Canned Tuna (in water) has more protein: 27g vs 18g per serving. That's a difference of 9g.

Which has fewer calories, Canned Tuna (in water) or Edamame?

Canned Tuna (in water) has 130 calories per serving vs 188 calories in Edamame — a difference of 58 calories.

Is Canned Tuna (in water) or Edamame better for keto?

Canned Tuna (in water) is the better keto choice at 0g carbs per serving vs 14g carbs in Edamame.

Is Canned Tuna (in water) or Edamame better for weight loss?

For weight loss, Canned Tuna (in water) gives you more calorie flexibility (58 cal less per serving). For preserving muscle during a deficit, Canned Tuna (in water) delivers more protein per calorie. Most people on cuts benefit from Canned Tuna (in water).

Which Is Better for Your Goal?

🔥 Weight Loss

Canned Tuna (in water)

Higher protein-to-calorie density + lower absolute fat = more satiety per calorie.

💪 Muscle Gain

Canned Tuna (in water)

Higher absolute protein per serving better supports muscle protein synthesis.

🥑 Low-Carb / Keto

Canned Tuna (in water)

Lower carbohydrate content fits keto and low-carb macros without burning your carb budget.

Both fit most balanced diets. These verdicts reflect macro-only comparisons — taste, satiety, cost, and personal preference also matter.

Find Your Personal Macros

The "right" food depends on your individual macro targets. Calculate yours in 60 seconds:

→ Calculate My Macros (Free)

Related Comparisons

Other ways Canned Tuna (in water) and Edamame stack up:

Full Canned Tuna (in water) guideFull Edamame guideAll comparisons