Canned Tuna (in water) vs Shrimp

Side-by-side macro comparison. Canned Tuna (in water) vs Shrimp per their standard serving sizes.

Canned Tuna (in water)

per 1 can (142g drained)

130 cal
27g Protein
0g Carbs
1g Fat
Full Canned Tuna (in water) macros →
vs

Shrimp

per 100g cooked

99 cal
24g Protein
0.2g Carbs
0.3g Fat
Full Shrimp macros →

Macro Comparison Table

Macro Canned Tuna (in water) Shrimp Difference
Calories 130 cal 99 cal +31% Canned
Protein 27g 24g +13% Canned
Carbs 0g 0.2g -100% Canned
Fat 1g 0.3g +233% Canned

Differences shown relative to Canned Tuna (in water). Positive = Canned Tuna (in water) has more.

Quick Take

Canned Tuna (in water) delivers 130 calories per serving with 27g protein, 0g carbs, and 1g fat. Shrimp delivers 99 calories with 24g protein, 0.2g carbs, and 0.3g fat. The most meaningful difference: Shrimp saves 31 calories per serving — meaningful over a week of meals. Both deliver similar protein density.

When to Pick Each

For Cutting / Weight Loss

When cutting on a tight calorie budget, Shrimp gives you 31 more calories of headroom per serving — that's room for an extra snack, more vegetables, or a higher-protein second portion. If protein density matters more (which it does for preserving muscle on a deficit), Shrimp delivers more grams of protein per calorie consumed.

For Bulking / Muscle Gain

For muscle gain, you want calories AND protein. Canned Tuna (in water) brings 130 calories — useful when you're chasing a surplus and struggling to eat enough. Canned Tuna (in water) delivers 27g of protein per serving, which directly feeds muscle protein synthesis. The best pick depends on whether you need more total calories or more usable protein.

For Keto / Low-Carb

Both Canned Tuna (in water) and Shrimp are keto-friendly with under 10g carbs per serving.

Frequently Asked

Which has more protein, Canned Tuna (in water) or Shrimp?

Canned Tuna (in water) has more protein: 27g vs 24g per serving. That's a difference of 3g.

Which has fewer calories, Canned Tuna (in water) or Shrimp?

Shrimp has 99 calories per serving vs 130 calories in Canned Tuna (in water) — a difference of 31 calories.

Is Canned Tuna (in water) or Shrimp better for keto?

Canned Tuna (in water) is the better keto choice at 0g carbs per serving vs 0.2g carbs in Shrimp.

Is Canned Tuna (in water) or Shrimp better for weight loss?

For weight loss, Shrimp gives you more calorie flexibility (31 cal less per serving). For preserving muscle during a deficit, Shrimp delivers more protein per calorie. Most people on cuts benefit from Shrimp.

Which Is Better for Your Goal?

🔥 Weight Loss

Shrimp

Higher protein-to-calorie density + lower absolute fat = more satiety per calorie.

💪 Muscle Gain

Canned Tuna (in water)

Higher absolute protein per serving better supports muscle protein synthesis.

🥑 Low-Carb / Keto

Canned Tuna (in water)

Lower carbohydrate content fits keto and low-carb macros without burning your carb budget.

Both fit most balanced diets. These verdicts reflect macro-only comparisons — taste, satiety, cost, and personal preference also matter.

Find Your Personal Macros

The "right" food depends on your individual macro targets. Calculate yours in 60 seconds:

→ Calculate My Macros (Free)

Related Comparisons

Other ways Canned Tuna (in water) and Shrimp stack up:

Full Canned Tuna (in water) guideFull Shrimp guideAll comparisons