Chicken Tenderloin vs Impossible Burger
Side-by-side macro comparison. Chicken Tenderloin vs Impossible Burger per their standard serving sizes.
Chicken Tenderloin
per 100g cooked
Impossible Burger
per 4oz patty, 113g
Macro Comparison Table
| Macro | Chicken Tenderloin | Impossible Burger | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 153 cal | 240 cal | -36% Chicken |
| Protein | 30g | 19g | +58% Chicken |
| Carbs | 0g | 9g | -100% Chicken |
| Fat | 3g | 14g | -79% Chicken |
Differences shown relative to Chicken Tenderloin. Positive = Chicken Tenderloin has more.
Quick Take
Chicken Tenderloin delivers 153 calories per serving with 30g protein, 0g carbs, and 3g fat. Impossible Burger delivers 240 calories with 19g protein, 9g carbs, and 14g fat. The most meaningful difference: Chicken Tenderloin saves 87 calories per serving — meaningful over a week of meals. For protein density per calorie, Chicken Tenderloin wins at 78% of calories from protein.
When to Pick Each
For Cutting / Weight Loss
When cutting on a tight calorie budget, Chicken Tenderloin gives you 87 more calories of headroom per serving — that's room for an extra snack, more vegetables, or a higher-protein second portion. If protein density matters more (which it does for preserving muscle on a deficit), Chicken Tenderloin delivers more grams of protein per calorie consumed.
For Bulking / Muscle Gain
For muscle gain, you want calories AND protein. Impossible Burger brings 240 calories — useful when you're chasing a surplus and struggling to eat enough. Chicken Tenderloin delivers 30g of protein per serving, which directly feeds muscle protein synthesis. The best pick depends on whether you need more total calories or more usable protein.
For Keto / Low-Carb
Both Chicken Tenderloin and Impossible Burger are keto-friendly with under 10g carbs per serving.
Frequently Asked
Which has more protein, Chicken Tenderloin or Impossible Burger?
Chicken Tenderloin has more protein: 30g vs 19g per serving. That's a difference of 11g.
Which has fewer calories, Chicken Tenderloin or Impossible Burger?
Chicken Tenderloin has 153 calories per serving vs 240 calories in Impossible Burger — a difference of 87 calories.
Is Chicken Tenderloin or Impossible Burger better for keto?
Chicken Tenderloin is the better keto choice at 0g carbs per serving vs 9g carbs in Impossible Burger.
Is Chicken Tenderloin or Impossible Burger better for weight loss?
For weight loss, Chicken Tenderloin gives you more calorie flexibility (87 cal less per serving). For preserving muscle during a deficit, Chicken Tenderloin delivers more protein per calorie. Most people on cuts benefit from Chicken Tenderloin.
Which Is Better for Your Goal?
🔥 Weight Loss
Chicken Tenderloin
Higher protein-to-calorie density + lower absolute fat = more satiety per calorie.
💪 Muscle Gain
Chicken Tenderloin
Higher absolute protein per serving better supports muscle protein synthesis.
🥑 Low-Carb / Keto
Chicken Tenderloin
Lower carbohydrate content fits keto and low-carb macros without burning your carb budget.
Both fit most balanced diets. These verdicts reflect macro-only comparisons — taste, satiety, cost, and personal preference also matter.
Find Your Personal Macros
The "right" food depends on your individual macro targets. Calculate yours in 60 seconds:
→ Calculate My Macros (Free)Related Comparisons
Other ways Chicken Tenderloin and Impossible Burger stack up:
Full Chicken Tenderloin guide • Full Impossible Burger guide • All comparisons